Reading Forests, Seeing Trees: Visual Poetry with Neurohumanities

The new contexts of visual materiality engendered by the internet and digital age problematise traditional strategies of critically analysing experimental forms of poetry. By approaching poetry across history as a phenomenon that is both read and seen, this dissertation utilises selected vocabulary, paradigms, and discourses from cognitive neuroscience and psychology to suggest a novel way of analysing contemporary poetry. Under the rubric of Neurohumanities, this project evinces how empirical evidence can be brought into conversation with a literary critical analysis of visual poetry, as a trajectory is mapped from the once-contested combination of art and science to this project?s unique investigation. Within this dissertation, visual poetry and visual poetics are considered in a variety of contexts ? historical, material, critical ? while the case is made for their suitability for empirical analysis. Usurping the standard formula of interdisciplinary approaches to the arts and sciences, in which science is often delegated to `prove? what is already inherently known within a discipline such as poetry studies, the approach demonstrated here suggests how the two disciplines can inform and influence one another. Two Case Studies are presented: one on Canadian visual poetry that focuses on selected works by bpNichol, Derek Beaulieu, and Steve McCaffery; and the other on experimental visual poetry by women, with a focus on selected works by Mirella Bentivoglio, Judith Copithorne, and Susan Howe. The results of a mixed methods psychological experiment with poetry as its subject, conducted for this project, are discussed in tandem with a literary critical close reading. This analysis seeks to account for each Case Study?s respective theoretical engagements with the materiality of language and letterforms, authorial subjectivity, and the gendered experience of voice and silence, combining them with quantitative and qualitative empirical data. This approach is subsequently reflected on from a metacritical perspective, and studied for how this Neurohumanities approach can illuminate the benefits and limitations of combining disciplines. In its focus on small-press publications and historically marginalised poetry, the project engages not just with the interdisciplinary landscape of poetry and science, but with elements of poetry studies that have remained hitherto underappreciated in mainstream literary criticism. Ultimately, in its repudiation of linearity, its questioning of shape and visual perception, and examination of meaning, the dissertation investigates new methods through which two disparate fields might share a commonality both within the scope of this project, and in future forays into the interstices between art and science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.