Relación entre el entrenamiento deportivo y musical, y el comportamiento prosocial y la empatía en niños de 10 a 14 años de la ciudad de Cali.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente estudio comparó los efectos que tiene recibir entrenamiento musical y recibir entrenamiento deportivo en el desarrollo de la empatía y el comportamiento prosocial de dos grupos de niños de la ciudad de Cali. Inicialmente, el estudio se planteó con un diseño pre test-post test, sin embargo, una serie de dificultades hicieron que solamente se pudieran recolectar completos los datos de la fase pre, y sólo datos del grupo de formación musical en la fase post. La fase de recolección de datos de fase pre se realizó con niños que llevaban menos de cuatro meses en formación en música o en fútbol. Los instrumentos de medición empleados fueron el Cuestionario de Empatía de Toronto, la Prueba de Empatía por Dolor y la Prueba de Comportamiento Prosocial, además de registros de observación semiestructurados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".