MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986788629

Queering the Trans* Family Album. Elspeth H. Brown and Sara Davidmann, in conversation

2015· article· en· W6986788629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of the Arts London Research Online (University of the Arts London) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationIdentity (music)ForgettingPoliticsOral history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This journal article is co-authored by Sara Davidmann and Assoc. Prof Elspeth Brown, University of Toronto, Canada. 
\n
\nThe article discusses photographs taken by Sara Davidmann and oral history work by Assoc. Prof Elspeth Brown. The article explores the ‘Ken. To be destroyed’ family album photographs and a photograph album created by Prof. Stephen Whittle OBE, photographed by Davidmann. Issues of control and collaboration, queering the archive and identity politics in Brown’s and Davidmann’s research projects are outlined. The article concludes with an examination of the concerns of erasure, forgetting and remembering that are brought to the surface in Davidmann’s photographs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of the Arts London Research Online (University of the Arts London)Same topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207