Quantitative trait loci for spawning time and body weight in rainbow trout, testing for conserved effects across ancestral homeologues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I incorporated 53 microsatellite markers into an existing data set of 132 markers to construct an updated genetic linkage map of rainbow trout ('Oncorhynchus mykiss') spanning 26 linkage groups. Synteny of duplicated markers was used to confirm eight homeologous chromosome pairs. I detected eleven spawning time QTL and nine body weight QTL using segregating maternal and paternal alleles at 185 microsatellite loci. Spawning time QTL were conserved across two homeologous pairs with strong indication for three additional pairs. Body weight QTL were conserved across a single homeologous pair with compelling evidence for two additional pairs. Conservation was not universal as three spawning time and two body weight QTL were detected on a single homeologue. Three spawning time and four body weight QTL were detected on linkage groups with unknown homeologous relationships. This suggests that some duplicated genes controlling spawning time and body weight have been preserved in rainbow trout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".