Rendgenološka dijagnostika najučestalijih osteoartropatija\nu labrador retrivera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SažetakU svakodnevnoj veterinarskoj praksi dijagnostike i liječenja bolesti pasa kliničari se vrlo često susreću s različitim bolestima koje su učestalije u pojedinih pasmina pasa.Zbog svojih kvaliteta labrador retriver je vrlo popularna pasmina u našoj zemlji.Ta pasmina ima signifikantnu dobnu i spolnu predispoziciju na različite bolesti, osobito lokomotornog sustava.U mlađoj je dobi česta dijagnostika displazije kukova, lakatne displazije, osteohondroze ramenog zgloba, a u starijoj dobi degenerativne promjene kralježnice u obliku deformirajuće spondiloze.Poznavanje učestalosti i etiopatogeneze bolesti, te znanje i dijagnosticiranje rendgenološki vidljivih promjena uvelike će pomoći kliničarima u postavljanju precizne dijagnoze.Danas je u Republici Hrvatskoj rendgenološka pretraga temeljna slikovna dijagnostička metoda kojom diferencijalnodijagnostički možemo razlučiti različite osteoartropatije.Cilj rada je kolegama u svakodnevnoj veterinarskoj praksi ukazati na važnost rendgenološke dijagnostike najučestalijih osteoartropatija u labrador retrivera.n.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".