MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6986892704

Regards croisés sur la violence : actes du premier Colloque Annuel du Département d’Anthropologie de l’Université de Montréal, 26-27 mars 2018

2019· other· fr· W6986892704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · 2019
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousContext (archaeology)Work (physics)Traditional knowledge
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction / Thomas Lecomte et Gabrielle Tanguay ; Le devenir-jihadiste des occidentaux à l’ère d’internet : événements, affects et sens / Maria Mourani ; Regards anthropologiques sur la victimisation des femmes musulmanes / Auréliane Belliard ; Réflexion sur la décolonisation de la santé mentale : questionnements concernant la violence épistémique / Edgar Blanchet ; La gardienne de la langue tehuelche (la dernière locutrice du aonekko ‘a’ien) / Javier Domingo ; La violence subie par les adolescentes enceintes à Haïti / David Jean Simon ; Les territoires de la violence à Port-au-Prince : entre criminalité et inégalités socio-spatiales / Olivier Djems ; La démocratie démophobe, violence sociale et cooptation au Guatemala / Léa Vignalou ; Trois dimensions de la violence coloniale dans l’expérience des Coréens au Japon / Xavier Robillard-Martel ; Le paradoxe de la violence : de l’atout du soldat à la détresse du traumatisé / Servane Roupnel ; Le territoire comme victime, la violence au-delà de l’humain au sein des communautés autochtones et noires en Colombie / Daniel Ruiz-Serna ; Une économie politique de la violence, du sauvage et des catégories animales : la tauromachie, de la corrida espagnole au rodéo américain / Frédéric Saumade ; Bricolage de l’obscène : le discours de haine au temps de Trump / Luke Fleming et Thomas Lecomte

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)→French-language works237,207→