MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6986905788

The Role of Land Cover Classes and Rainfall Events on the Active Layer Thermal Regime in the High Arctic

2021· dissertation· en· W6986905788 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPermafrostActive layerTundraLand coverArcticSnow coverWater contentVegetation (pathology)Hydrology (agriculture)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The active layer’s thermal regime, which includes surface energy exchanges and soil thawing/freezing characteristics, is sensitive to environmental factors and processes, and has important implications on biogeochemical, hydrological and geomorphic processes. High Arctic land cover classes were hypothesized to affect the active layer’s thermal regime because they represent variations in environmental factors (e.g., vegetation cover, snow cover and soil moisture content). The objectives of this research were to fill knowledge gaps on the: 1) relationship between land cover classes and active layer thermal regimes, and on the 2) role of rainfall on active layer temperatures in the High Arctic. To address these objectives, air temperature, precipitation, soil temperature and soil moisture data were recorded within three land cover classes (polar semi-desert, mesic tundra and wet sedge) at the Cape Bounty Arctic Watershed Observatory (CBAWO), Nunavut, between 2012 and 2019. The data were used to calculate surface energy exchange (n-factors, surface offsets), mean annual ground temperature at 15 cm depth (MAGT15cm), mean annual ground temperature at the top of permafrost (TTOP), and empirical and modelled maximum thaw depth (MTD). The data were also used to determine characteristics of soil thawing and freezing, ground ice formation and melt, and the active layer’s thermal responses to rainfall. Results showed significant (p < 0.05) interclass differences in n-factors between all three land cover classes. However, MAGT15cm, TTOP and MTD were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between land cover classes (excluding wet sedge where MTD was not calculated), and the empirical MTD was consistently shallower than the modelled MTD. The soil temperature responses to rainfall were consistent between land cover classes and mostly consisted of a dampening of peak diel soil temperatures and a convergence of temperatures with depth. This study was unsuccessful at identifying ice formation and melt within the active layer by purely thermal measures. These results improve our understanding of the relationships between High Arctic land cover classes, rainfall events and the active layer thermal regime, which is critical for our ability to accurately model and predict hydrological and biogeochemical processes, permafrost degradation and landscape stability in continuous permafrost regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→