MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987053446

Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the H→ZZ→ℓ+ℓ−νν¯¯ Decay Channel with the ATLAS Detector

2011· article· en· W6987053446 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH. Lundbeck A/SCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceIsrael Science FoundationMax-Planck-GesellschaftLundbeckfondenBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungDanmarks GrundforskningsfondMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyCERNDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftTRIUMF
KeywordsHiggs bosonLarge Hadron ColliderStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Atlas (anatomy)ATLAS experimentBosonLuminosityCollision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A search for a heavy standard model Higgs boson decaying via H→ZZ→ℓ+ℓ−νν¯, where ℓ=e, μ, is presented. It is based on proton-proton collision data at s√=7 TeV, collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in the first half of 2011 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.04 fb−1. The data are compared to the expected standard model backgrounds. The data and the background expectations are found to be in agreement and upper limits are placed on the Higgs boson production cross section over the entire mass window considered; in particular, the production of a standard model Higgs boson is excluded in the region 340<mH<450 GeV at the 95% confidence level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207