MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987131621

Selecting Literature Texts for Kenyan High Schools, 1940 to 1998

2024· other· en· W6987131621 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSemiotics and Cultural Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCommonwealth Scholarship CommissionYork University
KeywordsHistoriographyIdeologyPoliticsEliteSyllabusGovernment (linguistics)NationalismOfficerSpanish Civil War
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An examination of the numbers, scope, and genres selected for Kenya’s English and literature high-school syllabi between 1940 and 1998 reveals four types of excluded literature: the 1950-1960 guerilla war for land and freedom; punitive/pacification expeditions; settler- and travel-literature, and orature. The gaps about the people’s resistance to imperialism were partly inspired by Kenyatta’s leitmotif to “forget the past”, which perpetuated the Mau Mau myth and triggered a state-inspired national amnesia about Kenya’s ignored—but not forgotten—independent war heroes. Abetted by pervasive lies, distortions, and omissions, this amnesia permeates Kenya’s media, public fora, and educational system. The dissertation contextualizes and documents Kenya’s historiography and nationalism expounded by Kenyatta’s government in “development” policies and educational goals. Evidence was gathered through conversations, interviews, and library research and includes orature, personal narratives, fiction, nonfiction, magazines, journals, teachers’ manuals, high-school syllabi, national exams, education and development plans and reports, government officials’ statements and speeches, administrative notes, reports, laws, and state acts. Accessing official documents—even lists of suggested texts or circulars convening meetings to select texts—was often complicated since many documents were “classified” as secret. The criteria for selecting texts were often haphazard and partisan, seemingly corresponding to the ideological and political exigencies of neo-colonial Kenya’s largely corrupt ruling elite and its imagination of the nation. For instance, a necessarily anonymous high-level educational officer revealed the existence of a 1980s secret committee—supervised by the Criminal Investigations Department and answerable directly to President—that vetted the final list of suggested texts. Evidence about Kenya’s high-school English and literature syllabi reveals three patterns: the genres studied were reduced slightly, the number of selected books and texts shrank significantly, and controversial topics were avoided or sanitized. Like the nation, the literature curriculum suffers historical amnesia and social, cultural, and political myopia. Moreover, the insipid recycling of texts decade after decade ignores much new material and many authors. Politically skewed, the pattern of selecting literary texts thus prompts questions about Kenya’s goals for education and their grave epistemological, political, and national implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it