Seconda stella a destra. La lontananza come «serbatoio di immagini inesplose», "Quaderni di «Filosofia», n. 1 (2021), Mimesis, Milano-Udine, p. 103-111
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seconda stella a destra.Seconda stella a destra.La lontananza come "serbatoio di immagini inesplose" La lontananza come "serbatoio di immagini inesplose" abstraCt: This short essay aims to focus on the intimate relationship between the idea of remoteness -as a space of fulfillment of desires, source of the otherness and of the possibility and, as such, as a tank of unexploded images -and that of memory -as a faculty, at once utopian and messianic, able to produce an effect upon the present and the future.Through a philosophical rereading of James Barrie's masterpiece, I will try to demonstrate the duplicity of this relationship: if on the first hand, distance can cloud memory, on the other it can constitute its essential condition.Therefore, since memory is not a linear course, but a discontinuous and intermittent image, even the distance that separates us from past events, and from our own past, is by no means static and immutable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".