MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987205499

Social Media Branding of Ka Pa Olapa O Na Pua Kukui

2025· article· en· W6987205499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Relations and Crisis Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaInterviewScheduleSocial organizationInfluencer marketingOrganizational cultureMedia relationsMedia management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project is a multimedia project showcasing Ka Pa Olapaonapuakukui. I will produce video, photo, and graphic content to be used on their social media accounts and websites. I will also be creating a graphic outline and posting schedule to be given to future Marketing and PR/Social media managers for the organizations. Ka Pa Olapaonapuakukui is based in Vancouver, WA. This organization is a branch under Piko Eha which is a non-profit organization that promotes Pacific Island culture. These organizations are relatively new and have had difficulty in building and maintaining their social media presence and increasing their audience outreach. As a native Hawaiian now living in the PNW, I understand the importance of maintaining ties to the culture that I grew up around. With this organization being an outlet for those of Pacific island descent or ties to the Pacific Islands, I feel that it is important to help an organization that connects them to the culture wherever they are. I will be interviewing the coordinator and founder of these organizations and conducting interviews used for media purposes and also to ensure that I am promoting the organization in the right way. By revamping and creating platforms for the organization to reach a wider audience, I also hope to create a “home” for people to be able to find the right resources when learning or reconnecting with Pacific island culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College)Same topicPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationFrench-language works237,207