The significant effects of parents on their children’s career development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although choosing a career is a long process, young generations can get help from their parents. A vocation that is appropriate for a person makes the person very satisfied, but finding a proper job is stressful. Parents have primary roles in that procedure. Their style of raising the child affects the child's personality and attachment. People try to choose an occupation based on their skills, attitudes, characteristics, and values. The inoculating factor of those things is their parents and their way of raising the children. Parenting styles consist of four dimensions: authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and uninvolved. All these dimensions shape the child's characteristics and selections in life. Some parents want to involve their children's career exploration by appropriately guiding them. There are some parental involvement programs, such as in Canada and Australia. In this paper, the main aim is to define these styles and how these styles affect people's life decisions. On the other hand, to understand the family effect on the child's career desires, there are examples from other countries in the paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".