SIDKÎ BABA’NIN VELÂYETNÂME MÜELLİFİ ALİ NİHÂNÎ’YE DAİR HATIRALARI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Memoirs are the literary texts that individuals have written about moments and events that took place in their lives. There are significant pieces of works written in Turkish and world literature in this genre. These works are often created with the purpose of ensuring that other people are aware of the events and individuals that the author came across and thought to be important and preventing the people and events mentioned in these memoirs from being forgotten. Relatively important information can be found between the lines of these memoirs. Through these works, an important part of the life of a writer can be informed about a lost work or a new copy of a recognized work. Sıdkî Baba who lived between the second half of the 19th century and the first quarter of the 20th century has an important role in Alevi-Bektashi tradition and is recognized with his works on Alevi-Bektashi culture and its world of thought. He is also respected due to his close relations with Şeyh Cemâleddin Efendi and Mudarris Ali Nihânî in the Hacı Bektash Velî Dervish Convent where he studied at a young age. In the documents written by the Sıdkî Baba in 1341/1923 that comprises of his memoirs, there are notes regarding Ali Nihânî’s life and unknown facts about his work. In this study, the analysis of these documents revealed information about Ali Nihânî’s hometown, family, education, teaching activities in the Dervish Convent, his illness, death, and funeral as well as the story of the writing of his work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".