MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987288200

A stochastic computing implementation of the disparity energy model for depth perception

2016· dissertation· en· W6987288200 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsStochastic computingNeuromorphic engineeringResilience (materials science)Massively parallelArtificial neural networkEfficient energy useReduction (mathematics)Product (mathematics)Energy (signal processing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Implementing neuromorphic algorithms is increasingly interesting as the error resilience and low-area, low-energy nature of biological systems becomes the potential solution for problems in robotics and artificial intelligence. While conventional digital methods are inefficient in implementing massively parallel systems, analog solutions are hard to design and program. Stochastic computing (SC) is a natural bridge that allows pseudo-analog computations in the digital domain using low-complexity hardware. However, large-scale SC systems traditionally suffered from long latencies, hence higher energy consumption. This thesis develops a VLSI architecture for an SC based binocular vision system based on a disparity-energy model that emulates the hierarchical multi-layered neural structure in the primary visual cortex. The architecture is compact, adder-free and achieves better disparity detection at very low latencies compared to a floating-point version by using a modified disparity-energy model. A 1D 1x100 pixel processing system is synthesized using TSMC 65nm CMOS technology and achieves a reduction of 84% in area-delay product and 62% in energy compared to a fixed point implementation without error normalization. Further, at the same error rate, the generalized 2D stochastic architecture proposed to ease reusability achieves 89% reduction in area-delay product and 81% in energy savings compared to a fixed-point implementation. This demonstrates stochastic computing to be a strong candidate to implement large-scale neuromorphic algorithms efficiently. We also presented several insights into the differences and similarities between IBM's TrueNorth architecture and stochastic computing, proposing potential venues for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207