MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987321784

Soot emissions from turblent diffusion flames burning simple alkane fuels

2007· article· en· W6987321784 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Association of Petroleum Producers
KeywordsSootResidence time (fluid dynamics)BuoyancyRange (aeronautics)CombustionDiffusionScalingDiffusion flame
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantitative results of mass of soot emitted per mass of fuel burned are presented for a range of flow conditions and fuels. Using digital imaging, flame lengths have also been measured and used to estimate flame residence times. Comparisons are made between the current measurements and results of earlier researchers for soot in the overfire region. Validity and applicability of buoyancy based models for predicting and scaling soot emissions will also be considered. The end goal of this research is to develop an experimentally based model to predict PM emissions from flares used in industry using soot emissions data from lab-scale flares. Such a model will allow industry to meet its federally mandated reporting requirements while providing industry a framework for emissions reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207