MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987325594

Statistics in Focus. Latest developments for production and new orders in industry (excluding construction) during the second quarter of 2005. 2005.39

2005· other· en· W6987325594 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Production (economics)Seasonal adjustmentStatistical analysisEconomic indicator
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

04 Q1-05 Q2-05 EU-25 Euro-zone EU-25 Euro-zone EU-25 Euro-zone Q3-04 0.1 0.3 Q3-04 2.6 2.8 Q4-04 -0.1 -0.2 Q4-04 1.2 1.1 Q1-05 -0.1 0.0 Q1-05 0.5 0.9 Q2-05 0.5 0.4 Q2-05 0.4 0.5 Quarter on quarter growth rates, seasonally adjusted data Year on year growth rates, working day adjusted data Q1-04 Q2-04 Q3-04 Q4-04 Q1-05 Q2-05 Q1-04 Q2-04 Q3-04 Q4-04 Q1-05 Q2-05 EU-25 0.5 0.8 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.5 1.6 3.3 2.6 1.2 0.5 0.4 Euro-zone 0.2 0.8 0.3 -0.2 0.0 0.4 1.0 3.0 2.8 1.1 0.9 0.5 BE 1.8 0.0 1.8 -0.5 -1.9 0.2 1.8 2.0 5.5 3.6 -1.2 -0.7 CZ 3.0 2.9 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.7 7.8 11.3 10.0 7.7 4.9 3.9 DK 1.3 1.1 -1.2 -1.3 0.2 2.5 -1.0 1.5 -0.4 -0.5 -2.3 1.8 DE 0.2 1.4 0.5 0.0 1.5 0.4 1.5 4.0 4.7 2.0 3.5 2.5 EE -0.1 2.2 4.5 0.0 1.2 4.3 6.9 6.9 7.9 6.7 8.3 10.2 EL 0.3 1.6 -1.2 -1.3 -0.6 0.4 2.2 2.3 0.9 -0.8 -1.9 -2.6 ES 0.3 0.7 0.1 -0.5 0.2 0.3 1.4 2.4 2.2 0.4 0.4 0.1 FR 0.7 0.6 -0.6 0.9 0.0 -0.5 0.3 3.2 1.9 1.8 0.8 0.0 IE -4.2 -0.1 0.2 -1.6 -1.2 0.1 4.4 3.1 0.0 -5.8 -2.8 -2.5 IT -0.4 -0.1 -0.2 -1.3 -0.8 0.7 -0.5 1.0 -1.0 -2.1 -2.5 -1.4 CY 0.5 -1.1 -0.3 1.3 0.4 : 2.1 0.8 -0.6 0.5 0.6 : LV 3.5 -0.5 0.0 0.8 1.0 4.4 10.9 7.6 4.1 3.6 1.0 6.4 LT 2.0 -1.1 2.2 4.6 -1.4 2.5 11.3 17.9 7.7 7.7 4.5 8.5 LU 3.8 0.4 1.3 -0.2 2.9 1.8 6.6 8.9 7.0 5.1 5.3 6.1 HU 1.5 -0.1 0.6 1.6 1.3 4.8 9.5 8.8 5.0 3.6 3.2 8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh)French-language works237,207