Študija trajnostne mobilnosti na primeru stanovanjske soseske Škofovi zavodi v Ljubljani
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diplomska naloga se osredotoča na vprašanja učinkovitega načrtovanja trajnostnih potovalnih omrežij na območju mestnega prostora. Trajnostna mobilnost spodbuja načine potovanja, kot so hoja, kolesarjenje in uporaba javnega prevoza. S premišljeno umestitvijo pešpoti, kolesarskih poti in linij javnega prevoza v grajeni prostor se v njem občutno zmanjša problem prekomerne uporabe osebnih avtomobilov. Načrtovanje trajnostnih potovalnih omrežij je neposredno odvisno od urbane oblike. Pomembno je, da za učinkovito delovanje javnega prevoza načrtujemo gosto grajene urbane oblike z mešanimi programi okoli multimodalnih potovalnih koridorjev in vozlišč, s čimer zagotavljamo hitro dostopnost do uporabe javnega prevoza in različnih storitev. Zgoščena urbana oblika krajša potovalne razdalje, za premagovanje katerih človek ne čuti potrebe po uporabi avtomobila, saj jih lahko prehodi ali prekolesari. Principe načrtovanja trajnostnega mobilnega omrežja sem s pomočjo metode TOD (Transit-oriented development) prikazala na primeru urbanistične zasnove stanovanjske soseske Škofovi zavodi v Ljubljani.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".