Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis is an exploration of visitors’ experience of museums in the frame of the everyday. It employs the differentiation between place and space, as elaborated by philosopher Henri Lefebvre in The Production of Space, to investigate the environments in which individual reflexivity happens. It questions how places and spaces are assigned to specific purposes and by the same means condition the way individuals experience them. The main outcome of this research is a hand-printed curatorial essay to be launched in the context of a visit to the Art Gallery of Ontario and a home-cooked dinner that was to take place in the Criticism and Curatorial Practices lounge at 205 Richmond Street. The guests – my colleagues from the CCP program – were invited to experience what geographers Ellen Kohl and Priscilla McCutcheon call kitchen table reflexivity. \n \nKeywords: Museum experience, Everyday, Reflexivity, Informality, Fluid identity, architecture, space, place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it