MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987495072

Synthetic Correlated Diffusion Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection and Risk Assessment

2023· dissertation· en· W6987495072 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerMagnetic resonance imagingModality (human–computer interaction)ProstateRisk assessmentDiffusion MRIMultiparametric MRICancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common form of cancer among men worldwide and the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men in 112 countries. While the overall 5-year survival rate for prostate cancer is very high, prognosis varies considerably depending on how early PCa is diagnosed and how aggressively it develops. As such, PCa screening is critical for early detection and treatment of PCa. However, many PCas develop slowly and pose a minimal risk of PCa-related mortality, in which case treatment can be limited to active surveillance of tumour development. Over the last few decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) been used extensively for PCa screening and assessment. In particular, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), where multiple MRI modalities are acquired, is commonly used for PCa imaging. However, the use of mpMRI requires radiologists to interpret multiple MRI images in parallel, resulting in increased inter-observer variability. This is especially true for radiologists with less experience interpreting prostate MRI images. In an effort to address these concerns, a computational MRI modality known as correlated diffusion imaging (CDI) was introduced, with initial results showing promise for CDI as a PCa screening tool. However, CDI is uncalibrated and strongly dependent on the underlying MRI protocols used to compute it, which leads to inconsistencies across different protocols and significant inter- and intra-patient variability. In this thesis, a computational MRI technique known as synthetic correlated diffusion imaging (CDIs) is introduced. CDIs extends CDI through the addition of synthetic DWI and per-patient calibration, thereby providing flexibility and consistency beyond that of CDI. Additionally, a gradient-based optimization framework is developed through which the parameters of CDIs may be optimized for downstream clinical tasks. The proposed CDIs and optimization framework were evaluated against current standard MRI modalities using a clinical MRI dataset comprising 200 PCa patients. Through clinical interpretation by an experienced radiologist, CDIs was found to provide better tissue contrast between healthy, low-risk PCa, and high-risk PCa than standard MRI modalities. This suggests that CDIs provides visual indications of PCa and PCa risk level, which may allow radiologists to make more accurate and consistent conclusions from imaging alone. CDIs may also be used to guide prostate biopsies, potentially indicating better biopsy locations and reducing the number of biopsies required. Upon quantitative evaluation, CDIs achieved a voxel-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8446 for separation of healthy and PCa tissue, representing an increase of 0.0315 (p<0.0001) over the best-performing standard MRI modality and indicating the potential of CDIs for PCa screening and diagnosis. Moreover, CDIs achieved a voxel-level AUC of 0.8530 for distinguishing between high- and low-risk cancers, representing an increase of 0.1590 (p<0.0001) over the best-performing standard MRI modality and indicating the potential of CDIs for PCa risk assessment. These results suggest that CDIs may improve voxel-level identification of PCa, which is valuable for PCa localization and segmentation. Moreover, machine learning models trained on CDIs images can benefit from this improved voxel-level contrast, potentially achieving better diagnostic, prognostic, or segmentation performance than models trained on standard MRI images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207