MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987656027

Textos selecionados de filosofia da ciência.

2021· book· pt· W6987656027 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUFPEL (Universidade Federal de Pelotas) · 2021
Typebook
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and Historical Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStanford Bio-XUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OxfordUniversity of PittsburghPrinceton UniversityJohn Templeton Foundation
KeywordsOrder (exchange)AgoraRelation (database)Subject (documents)Meaning (existential)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Que este volume I, de Textos selecionados de Filosofia da
\nCiência, sirva como subsídio para qualquer interessado em filosofia de modo
\ngeral, e, em especial, aos alunos de graduação cursando alguma disciplina de
\nFilosofia da Ciência. É nossa intenção, ainda, que professores de Filosofia
\npossam aproveitar um ou mais textos desta coletânea em suas ementas ou em
\nseus planos de curso, seja como bibliografia básica, seja como secundária. Apesar
\nde ser um trabalho exaustivo, considerar que outros professores e tantos alunos
\npoderão agora se beneficiar do que fizemos aqui é uma recompensa e tanto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUFPEL (Universidade Federal de Pelotas)Same topicPhilosophy and Historical ThoughtFrench-language works237,207