MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987801986

UGA LAW STUDENTS AWARDED PRESTIGIOUS JUDICIAL CLERKSHIPS

2000· article· en· W6987801986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePress Releases · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduation (instrument)AtlantaWork (physics)NewspaperQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monday, October 9, 2000 WRITER: Jenny Bogan, (706) 542-5172 CONTACT: Kathy Pharr, (706) 542-5172, pharr@arches.uga.edu UGA LAW STUDENTS AWARDED PRESTIGIOUS JUDICIAL CLERKSHIPS Athens, Ga. - Twelve members of the University of Georgia School of Law's Class of 2001 have been named to prestigious federal judicial clerkships, and will begin working with the judges after their graduation in May 2001. Associate Professor Richard Nagareda, chair of the Faculty Subcommittee on Judicial Clerkships, calls the clerks "wonderful ambassadors" of the law school to the leading judges in the country. "The clerkship application process is becoming increasingly competitive," said Nagareda. "But our students have continued to secure these prestigious positions. In fact, we regularly hear from judges that our students often are better prepared for the 'hands-on' legal work of a clerkship than students from the top private law schools in the land. That is a tremendous credit to our faculty and something that will contribute to the continued success of UGA clerkship applicants in the future." They are: Ann Carson Alias of Atlanta - Judge Jack T. Camp, Northern District of Georgia - Atlanta; Robert L. Anderson of Huntsville, Alabama - Chancellor William B. Chandler, Delaware Chancery Court - Georgetown, Delaware; Cindy M. Andrist of Martinez - Judge Frank Mays Hull, 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals - Atlanta; Jennifer Auer of Eastman - Judge Anthony A. Alaimo, Southern District of Georgia - Brunswick; A. Franklin Beacham III of Statesboro - Judge Harold L. Murphy, Northern District of Georgia - Rome; Charles J. Bethel of Dalton - Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr., Northern District of Georgia - Atlanta; Samuel C. Burch - Judge Duross Fitzpatrick, Middle District of Georgia - Macon; W. Michael D'Antignac - Judge William T. Moore, Jr., Southern District of Georgia - Savannah; Mace E. Gunter of Milledgeville - Judge Dudley H. Bowen, Southern District of Georgia - Augusta; Eleanor A. Mixon - Judge Dudley H. Bowen, Southern District of Georgia - Augusta; James L. Roberts - Judge Anthony A. Alaimo, Southern District of Georgia - Brunswick; G. Gardiner Thompson - Judge Emmett Ripley Cox, 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals - Mobile, Alabama. # #

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it