"Une chose pour le théâtre": Ines Pérée et Inat Tendu de Réjean Ducharme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Réjean Ducharme’s collection houses a treasure trove of typescripts and manuscripts, among which are five dactylograms of his inaugural play, Ines Pérée et Inat Tendu, officially published in 1976. Delving into the dossier of his work not only offers insights into the motivations behind each unpublished version but also allows us to uncover the playwright Ducharme as he forged his own style of conceiving a dramatic play. As we discover the unpublished variants, a tempting question emerges: can we truly grasp the essence of a play solely through its official published text? Interviews with stage professionals who have brought the play to life over the years reveal their memories. They will immerse us to the concreate moment of each staging, spanning from 1968 to 2012, each revival giving birth to a singular theatrical experience. An analysis of Ines Pérée et Inat Tendu dossier illustrates Ducharme’s deep involvement and influence in the conception and creating of “this thing for the theatre”.\nThe dossier takes witness to the social changes that have given it a special place in the history of Quebec theatre, which we are going to rediscover and celebrate together.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".