MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987824948

U-Pb Geochronology of Mid-Crustal Rocks Exhumed Along the Denali Fault in the Eastern Alaska Range

2022· other· en· W6987824948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeochronologyTerraneZirconPlutonismFault (geology)DevonianPlutonMetamorphic rockProtolith
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For much of its length, the Denali fault juxtaposes the Wrangellia Composite terraneagainst the ancestral North American margin. However, the location of the main geologic\nboundary between the Wrangellia Composite terrane and the North American margin is obscured\nin the Alaska Range Suture Zone. In the Eastern Alaska Range, where persistent and rapid\nexhumation has been occurring since ~23 Ma, the origin and protolith of the rocks north of the\nDenali fault is unknown. We present new U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology from seven\nsamples collected in the eastern Alaska Range located within this region of focused exhumation.\nThe prevalence of suspected metamorphic grains, grains affected by lead loss, and newly\ncrystallized grains due to regional plutonism provided challenges when filtering our data. Grains\nfrom each data set with U/Th ratios > 10, Uranium content > 5,000 ppm, or U-Pb ages > 3%\nerror were removed. Additionally, neo-crystallized grains were identified and removed based on\nthe known distribution of U-Pb zircon ages of plutons in the immediate field area. The maximum\ndepositional age of our samples ranges from Late Devonian to Middle Triassic. These findings\ncontradict previous mapping and suggest that many assemblages in the eastern Alaska Range\nwill be mapped differently with future detailed mapping. It is possible rocks to the north of the\nDenali fault in the eastern Alaska Range have ties with the ancestral North American margin,\nwhich would be expected based on geographic location and would imply these rocks have\nremained in place. Alternatively, it is also possible that one of our samples has sediment sourced\nfrom the southern portion of the Alexander terrane, and two of our samples have sediment\nsourced from the Endicott Arm of the southeastern Yukon Tanana terrane. If these correlations\nare correct, this requires >1000 kilometers of transport, which requires slip on a separate\nstructure from the Denali fault.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207