MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987825827

Using stable water isotopes and isotope-enabled hydrologic modelling to quantify water in Central and Northeastern Ontario

2023· dissertation· en· W6987825827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationWater cycleClimate changeHydrology (agriculture)StreamflowHydrological modelling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The understanding of hydrologic processes in Central and Northern Ontario's mesoscale
\nwatersheds, located within the Precambrian Shield region, remains limited, posing challenges for
\naccurate hydrological modeling and assessment of climate change impacts on water resources.
\nThis study focuses on Central and Northeastern Ontario, typically characterized by granitic
\nbedrock, small depressions, and shallow acidic soils, where annual precipitation exceeds
\nevapotranspiration, resulting in abundant surface waters. Changes in hydrological processes in this
\nregion can have significant consequences for the local ecosystem of mesoscale watersheds.
\nTherefore, investigating the effects of climate change on water quantity is crucial.
\nThis research utilizes stable water isotopes (SWIs) as cost-effective tools to improve our
\nunderstanding of hydrologic processes and flowpaths in mesoscale Precambrian Shield
\nwatersheds. By analyzing long-term meteorological, hydrometric, and SWI data from the Sturgeon
\nRiver, French River, and Muskoka River watersheds, valuable insights are gained regarding the
\nimpacts of climate change on hydrological processes in these regions. The study employs a new
\nisotope-enabled distributed hydrologic model, isoWATFLOOD, which provides a good
\n
\nrepresentation of fluxes, storages, and their changes due to climate change in mesoscale and large-
\nscale watersheds.
\n
\nThe research objectives include exploring the key controls and importance of surface water
\nstorage (lakes and wetlands) on hydrologic function in the Sturgeon River-Lake Nipissing-French
\nRiver (SNF) and Muskoka watersheds, evaluating isoWATFLOOD hydrologic model's
\nperformance in simulating streamflow and isotope values in the Sturgeon River-Lake Nipissing
\n(SN) watershed, evaluating the importance of wetland connectivity representation in
\nisoWATFLOOD performance across the SN watershed, and assessing the impacts of climate
\nchange on streamflow and hydrologic partitioning in the SN watershed using the isoWATFLOOD
\nhydrologic model.
\nPCA and HCPC approaches are used to identify variation in controls on hydrologic function
\nin SNF and Muskoka watersheds using combination of hydrometric, geology, landscape and
\nisotopic metrics. The findings reveal greater evaporative enrichment impacts in Muskoka
\ncompared to the SNF catchments, with Muskoka exhibiting less variability in streamflow isotopes.
\nThe study identifies a positive correlation between wetland area and damping ratio (coefficient of
\nvariation of isotopes in streamflow to coefficient of variation of isotopes in precipitation), suggesting that wetland connection/disconnection and varying evaporation impacts contribute to
\nisotopic value variability in catchments with higher wetland coverage. Muskoka and SNF
\ncatchments generally fall into separate clusters, primarily influenced by wetland and lake area
\npercentages, mean slope, and the extent of glacialacustrine and glaciofluvial outwash deposits. The
\ncombination of catchment classification analyses and stable isotopes (δ
\n
\n18O and δ
\n
\n2H) proved
\neffective in studying how different catchment characteristics influence variations in hydrometric
\nresponse.
\nAn application of isoWATFLOOD was set up for Sturgeon River-Lake Nipissing (SN)
\nwatershed. Five separate models with varied connected wetland (CW) ratios between 10% to 50%
\nare set up to evaluate the importance of CW ratio in model performance. The SN isoWATFLOOD
\nmodel, calibrated using isotope and streamflow data, successfully simulates streamflow and
\nisotope values (KGE > 0.6) across 11 catchments. Wetland connectivity percentage significantly
\ninfluences streamflow and isotope simulations, particularly during the calibration period. The most
\naccurate streamflow simulations occur with 40% wetland connectivity, improving baseflow
\nrepresentation. This study advances isotope-enabled hydrologic simulations using
\nisoWATFLOOD and provides insights into wetland connectivity representation, a critical
\nlandscape aspect of Precambrian Shield watersheds. Stable isotopes prove valuable in addressing
\nthe challenge of equifinality.
\nUsing the SN isoWATFLOOD model and considering 16 global climate model (GCM)-
\nemission (RCP) models, findings project a future characterized by warmer and wetter climatic
\nconditions (2020-2082) compared to the baseline period (1990-2019). On average, the study
\npredicts an annual discharge increase ranging from 4.8% to 11.5%, with elevated winter and fall
\nstreamflow across the watershed. These changes result from warmer fall and winter seasons,
\nreduced freezing days, increased annual precipitation, and more frequent extreme precipitation
\nevents. Additionally, the simulations indicate an earlier spring freshet peakflow, accompanied by
\na reduced peak flow rate. Furthermore, climate change will impact hydrological partitioning,
\nleading to alterations in the contributions of annual average daily baseflow to streamflow.
\nMoreover, there will be a rise in average annual daily direct runoff due to intensified annual
\nprecipitation, more frequent extreme precipitation events, and rain-on-snow occurrences within
\nthe watershed. The results highlight the significance of integrating climate change impacts into water resources management planning, specifically concerning peak flow timing, seasonality, and
\nchanges in flow volume during different seasons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207