Urban conservation : a compilation of investigation reports completed in 1973 and 1977
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Urban conservation: Fitzroy Programme 1973 -- 2. Urban conservation in the block bounded by Smith, Gertrude, George and Victoria Streets, Gitzroy, 1973 / J. Bolwell -- 3. Conservation study of the block bounded by Fitzroy, Johnston, Nicholson and King William Streets, Fitzroy, 1973 / T. Fay -- 4. Conservation study of the block bounded by Nicholson, Gertrude, Fitzroy an King William Streets, Fitzroy, 1973 / P. G. Holland -- 5. Conservation study of the block bounded by George, Gertrude and Brunswick Streets with Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, 1973 / P. Mason -- 6. Conservation study of the block bounded by Gertrude, Johnston and Napier Streets, Fitzroy, 1973 / J. O'May -- 7. Conservation of Rae St., Fitzroy, 1977 / G. Harpley -- 8. Conservation of the block bounded by Gertrude, Gore, Condell and Smith Streets, Fitzroy, 1977 / J. Teng -- 9. Urban conservation in Fitzroy, 1977 / B. Katsipidis -- 10. Gore St., Fitzroy, 1977 / M. Munckton -- 11. Conservation report: Fitzroy, 1977 / H. Raggatt -- 12. Brookes Cres., Nth Fitzroy, 1977 / C. P. Smith.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".