Urban conservation : a compilation of investigation reports completed in 1973 and 1977
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Urban conservation: Fitzroy Programme 1973 -- 2. Urban conservation in the block bounded by Smith, Gertrude, George and Victoria Streets, Gitzroy, 1973 / J. Bolwell -- 3. Conservation study of the block bounded by Fitzroy, Johnston, Nicholson and King William Streets, Fitzroy, 1973 / T. Fay -- 4. Conservation study of the block bounded by Nicholson, Gertrude, Fitzroy an King William Streets, Fitzroy, 1973 / P. G. Holland -- 5. Conservation study of the block bounded by George, Gertrude and Brunswick Streets with Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, 1973 / P. Mason -- 6. Conservation study of the block bounded by Gertrude, Johnston and Napier Streets, Fitzroy, 1973 / J. O'May -- 7. Conservation of Rae St., Fitzroy, 1977 / G. Harpley -- 8. Conservation of the block bounded by Gertrude, Gore, Condell and Smith Streets, Fitzroy, 1977 / J. Teng -- 9. Urban conservation in Fitzroy, 1977 / B. Katsipidis -- 10. Gore St., Fitzroy, 1977 / M. Munckton -- 11. Conservation report: Fitzroy, 1977 / H. Raggatt -- 12. Brookes Cres., Nth Fitzroy, 1977 / C. P. Smith.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.029 | 0.036 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".