MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6987834204

Unraveling the mechanism of brain injury in asphyxiated newborns treated with hypothermia

2017· dissertation· en· W6987834204 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypothermiaCorpus callosumAsphyxiaDiffusion MRIPerinatal asphyxiaBrain damageBasal gangliaEncephalopathyMagnetic resonance imaging
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Birth asphyxia is one of the major cause of mortality and morbidity of newborns worldwide.Therapeutic hypothermia is the current treatment in term asphyxiated newborns in order to try preventing the development of brain injury.Induced hypothermia is believed to work by decreasing brain temperature and thus reducing baseline brain's metabolism and energy demand.Despite this treatment, some of the asphyxiated newborns still develop brain injury.The purpose of this thesis was to monitor the brain and its development in the asphyxiated term newborns treated with hypothermia, during the first month of life.To aim this goal, multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used: (I) brain temperature is noninvasively estimated in different time points during the first month of life using MR-spectroscopy, (II) the pattern of brain injury in the corpus callosum (CC) is studied using diffusion tensor imaging.In 42 patients who were enrolled for brain thermometry, it could be interpreted from the results that therapeutic hypothermia using current guidelines decreases brain temperature, but does not prevent an increase of brain temperature in asphyxiated newborns who develop brain injury.However, using diffusion tesnsor imaging (DTI) to investigate the pattern of brain injury in the corpus callosum, the results showed that this pattern would not be the same among all the newborns who develop brain injury and it depends on the type of injury (i.e.watershed area, basal ganglia or near-total brain injury) that they develop.In case of corpus callosum, newborns who develop watershed or near-total brain injury had significantly different ADC and FA values during the first month of life, compared to newborns with no brain injury and aslo with the control group.This research permit a better understanding of the mechanism of brain injury in newborns who suffer from birth asphyxia and who are treated with hypothermia.Furhter studies are required to better understand the imapct of injury on normal brain development in these newborns.iii RésuméAsphyxie à la naissance est l'une des principales causes de mortalité et de morbidité des nouveau-nés dans le monde entier.L'hypothermie thérapeutique est le traitement actuel en termes de nouveau-nés asphyxiées afin d'essayer de prévenir le développement d'une lésion cérébrale.Une hypothermie induite est estimé à travailler en diminuant la température du cerveau et donc de réduire le métabolisme et de l'énergie à la demande de cerveau de référence.Malgré ce traitement, certains des nouveau-nés asphyxiés développent encore des lésions cérébrales.Le but de cette thèse était de surveiller le cerveau et son développement dans les nouveau-nés à terme asphyxiées traités par hypothermie, au cours du premier mois de vie.Pour viser cet objectif, l'imagerie par résonance magnétique multi-modal (IRM) est utilisée:(I) la température du cerveau est non-invasivement estimée à différents moments au cours du premier mois de la vie en utilisant MR-spectroscopie, (II) le modèle de lésion cérébrale dans le corps calleux (CC) est étudié en utilisant l'imagerie du tenseur de diffusion.Dans 42 patients qui étaient inscrits pour le cerveau thermométrie, il pourrait être interprété à partir des résultats, que l'hypothermie thérapeutique utilisant les lignes directrices actuelles diminue la température du cerveau, mais n'empêche pas l'augmentation de la température du cerveau chez les nouveau-nés asphyxiées qui développent des lésions cérébrales.Cependant, en utilisant l'imagerie du tenseur de diffusion (DTI) pour mieux comprendre le modèle de lésion cérébrale dans le corps calleux, les résultats ont montré que ce modèle ne serait pas la même chez tous les nouveau-nés qui développent des lésions cérébrales et il dépend du type de blessure (i.e.bassin versant, le ganglion basal ou une lésion cérébrale quasi-totale) qu'ils développent.Dans le cas du corps calleux, les nouveau-nés qui développent des bassins versants ou de lésion cérébrale presque totale avaient des valeurs d'ADC et de FA significativement différentes au cours du premier mois de vie par rapport aux nouveau-nés sans lésion cérébrale, et en plus, avec le groupe de contrôle.Cette recherche permet une meilleure compréhension du mécanisme des lésions cérébrales chez les nouveau-nés qui souffrent d'asphyxie à la naissance et qui sont traités avec une hypothermie.Plus d'études sont nécessaires pour mieux comprendre l'impact de blessure sur le développement normal du cerveau chez ces nouveau-nés.ivAcknowledgment I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Pia Wintermark for her supervision and support during the course of this research.I thank the families and their newborns for participating in the study.Special thanks are also expressed to the members of NeoBrain laboratory and the NICU nurses, the NICU respiratory therapists, and the MRI technicians who have made this study possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology→French-language works237,207→