MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987911382

Valorización de Hudbay Perú S.A.C. (al cierre del año 2017)

2019· dissertation· es· W6987911382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEl Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del Pacífico (Universidad del Pacífico) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness, Education, Mathematics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingValue (mathematics)Context (archaeology)Time value of money
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El trabajo consiste valorizar Hudbay Perú S.A.C. (HBP), para lo cual se tendrán en cuenta los estados financieros auditados y públicos al 31 diciembre de 2017, y de años anteriores. También se utilizará información pública de Hudbay Minerals (HBM Corporativo) dirigida a los inversionistas en las bolsas de New York y Toronto, donde se empleará datos futuros de producción e inversión.
\nHBP es una empresa minera peruana que no cotiza en bolsa, el dueño del 100% de acciones es HBM. El método de flujos de caja descontados es el que se utilizó en el trabajo. El valor patrimonial de HBP es US$ 1,022 Millones. En el gráfico Football Field, se muestra el valor de HBP, obtenido con distintos métodos de valorización. La recomendación de inversión al 31 de diciembre 2017, es que las acciones de HBM (Hudbay Minerals corporativo), están sobrevalorados, porque el valor de HBP derivado del Market Cap es mayor al valor de HBP obtenido con el método de flujo de caja descontado en US$ 597 millones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEl Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del Pacífico (Universidad del Pacífico)Same topicBusiness, Education, Mathematics ResearchFrench-language works237,207