MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6988002365

The Use of Digital Mobile Technology for Rapid Assessment of Treatment Induced Cognitive Deficits in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

2025· article· en· W6988002365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionPopulationCognitive reframingMultiple myelomaCognitive testQuality of life (healthcare)Data collectionClinical trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with multiple myeloma may experience subjective changes in baseline cognitive function, which can span across various cognitive domains. Currently, there is limited data about the nature, severity, and temporal evolution of these deficits, as well as their relationship with disease and treatment-related factors. While advances in multiple myeloma treatments continue, few prospective trials have evaluated their impact on cognitive function and quality of life. The objective of this retrospective, cross sectional study is to assess potential cognitive changes in multiple myeloma patients undergoing therapy. This study aims to recruit approximately 60 participants, with 16 presently enrolled. To identify incidence and patterns of cognitive change, patients undergo comprehensive cognitive evaluations such as the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) battery, National Institute of Health Toolbox (NIB-TB), and the five-minute Montreal Cognitive Assessment screener (MoCA). Data collection and preliminary analysis on 16 participants (median age 72 years, 10/16 on first-line therapy) has revealed global cognitive impairment in 5/16 patients using the ICCTF battery and the NIH-TB, with verbal learning and memory, and executive function being the most affected domains. Future initiatives of this research will focus on expanding study population with the aim to validate preliminary trends in a larger cohort. Larger numbers will allow exploration of correlations between subjective and objective cognitive performance, and the potential differential impact of classes of treatment agents on cognitive function. Results from this study may yield hypotheses for future evaluation and validation in larger, prospective trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesFrench-language works237,207