Women’s Entrance to University in the 20th Century: Female Students’ Strategies and Restrictions on Their Access. The Case of Universidad de Concepción, Chile (1919-1929)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the access to higher education at Universidad de Concepción, Chile in South America, during the early years of the 20th century. This research focuses on the career choice by women, who opted mostly for the areas of pharmacy and education, reflecting both adherence to university’s explicit offerings and traditional gender roles related to caregiving. The central question addresses how women accessed to university, the careers selected and the moment in their life trajectories when they entered higher education. Using enrollment data, administrative documents, public speeches from university authorities and press articles of the time, it is revealed that these middle-class women were aware of the gender roles of their time, and pursued improvement in their lives through higher education, respecting the limits established by the social norms of the time. The article locates these students and their individual decisions at an intersection between the rhetoric of the time and their individual efforts to receive education and to obtain a profession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it