Концертно-гастрольная поездка Зои Гайдай в Канаду и США в 1946 г
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the article. The present research is linked with establishing the interrelation between art, ideology, and socio-cultural activity as the essence of Z. Haidai’s concert tour to Canada and the USA in 1946, at the beginning of the Cold War between the USSR and the West. The methodology of the research lies in applying the concrete-historical method to establish facts which caused the peculiarities and duration of that concert tour abroad, of the structural and functional method to study functioning of the Ukrainian classical vocal and performing art in the context of the Ukrainian cultural and artistic life, which was governed at that time by the official political ideology, and the general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, generalization etc.) for raising more profound points in the article conclusions. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that it describes for the first time the details of organization of Z. Haidai’s abroad concert tour beyond the Atlantic Ocean, which took place under support of pro-communist political forces of the three countries. This affected the format of this abroad concert tour, as well as determined the direction of Z. Haidai’s activity filled with the ideological propaganda, which Z. Haidai had been performing within the Soviet delegation. Conclusions. The analysis of the peculiarities of Z. Haidai’s abroad concert tour to the main North American countries helped to find out its political and propagandist nature, which substantially decreased its artistic value of the singer’s creative career, however enriched her experience with new events, in particular, meeting with Ukrainian diaspora and various impressions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".