Роль общественности в развитии въездного туризма в УССР
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Изучается роль наиболее массового общественного объединения УССР по обслуживанию въездных туристов с конца 1950-х до начала 1990-х гг. – Украинского общества дружбы и культурной связи с зарубежными странами. Доказано, что основной целью деятельности общества являлась пропаганда социалистического строя, укрепление дружеских и деловых контактов, понимания, доверия и культурного взаимодействия украинцев с населением зарубежных государств. Выявлено, что объединение обслуживало значительную часть въездных туристов, прибывших в УССР в составе туристических групп, «поездов дружбы и мира», а также различных делегаций. Отмечено, что большинство туристов, приезжавших из капиталистических государств, составляли украинские эмигранты, чаще из Канады и США. Перечислены активно использовавшиеся формы работы с туристами: праздничные собрания, вечера дружбы и мира, концерты, митинги, беседы по профессиям, посещение образовательных, просветительских и медицинских организаций, предприятий, колхозов. Показано, что в этих мероприятиях активно участвовали лидеры производства, руководители предприятий, медики, преподаватели, писатели, художники, композиторы. = The article examines the role of the mass public аssociation of the USSR Ukrainian society of friendship and cultural relations with foreign countries on maintenance of incoming tourists in a period from the end of 1950s for beginning of 1990s years. Proved that the primary purpose of activity of society was propaganda of socialistic line-up, strengthening of friendly and business contacts, understanding, trust and cultural co-operation of Ukrainians with the population of the foreign countries. It is revealed that the society served a significant portion of incoming tourists. The tourists arrived in the USSR as part of a tour groups, trains of friendship and peace, as well as delegations. The most of tourists arriving from the capitalist countries were Ukrainian immigrants, mainly from Canada and the USA. The most active in work with tourists the Society of friendship used such forms: festive gatherings, evenings of friendship and peace, concerts, rallies and discussions on occupations; visiting educational and medical organizations, enterprises, collective farms. In these events were actively attended by the leaders of production, leaders of enterprises, physicians, teachers, writers, artists, composers, participated actively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".