Africanistes et historiens : petite histoire croisée de l’Association canadienne des études africaines et de la Société historique du Canada / Africanists and historians: a small histoire croisée of the Canadian Association of African Studies and of the Canadian Historical Association
Bibliographic record
Abstract
« L’histoire de l’Afrique au Canada a une longue « histoire » comme branche des études africaines », c’est-à-dire comme projet multidisciplinaire, selon Christopher Youé de l’Université Mémorial, dont les recherches courantes portent sur les passés\nségrégationnistes de la Rhodésie (Zimbabwe), de l’Afrique du Sud et du Kenya au 20ème siècle. Cet état des choses reflète la\nsituation locale de plusieurs universités, où les africanistes travaillent de concert en vue de former une masse critique. En retour, les historiens ont longtemps dominé l’Association canadienne des études africaines (ACÉA), selon le président\nde l’heure, Alexie Tcheuyap, spécialiste des récits\ncinématographiques de l’Afrique francophone au Département de français de l’Université de Toronto, qui tente, depuis son élection, de faire en sorte que les arts y aient un rôle plus important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".