Ahmet Midhat Efendi’nin dağarcık mecmuası : (inceleme-seçme metinler-dizin)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dağarcık, Ahmet Midhat’ın 1872-1873 yıllarında yayınladığı bir mecmuadır. Romancı, gazeteci, eğitimci olan Ahmet Midhat, Tanzimat döneminde hâkim olan eklektik ve ansiklopedist çizgide çıkardığı mecmuada çeşitli konularda telif ve tercüme yazılar yayınlayarak halkı eğitmek yolunu benimser. On sayı çıkan Dağarcık’ta insanları sıkmadan ve zihinlerini fazla yormadan, hoşça vakit geçirterek bilgilendirmeyi amaçlar. Yazı hayatının başlarında çıkan bu mecmuadaki yazılar onun ileriki yıllarda yazacağı eserlere kaynak teşkil etmektedir. Burada geçen düşünceler gelişerek ya da değişerek sonraki romanlarında, makalelerinde ve diğer türdeki eserlerinde devam edecektir. \nDağarcık mecmuasındaki yazıların büyük çoğunluğu Ahmet Midhat tarafından yazılır veya tercüme edilir. Bunlar dışında mecmuada başta Recaizade Mahmud Ekrem olmak üzere çeşitli yazarların telif ve tercüme eserleri yer alır. Günümüzde fikrî açıdan kat kat aşılmış konular hakkında bilgi verse de bu mecmua, çıktığı yıllarda son derece yenilikçi fikirlerden bahseder. Mecmua, bu nedenle belli kesimler tarafından yadırganır ve çeşitli suçlamalara maruz kalır. Maarif Meclisinden izin alınmadan çıkarıldığı için onuncu sayısından sonra yayını durdurulan mecmua, kısa ömürlü olmasına rağmen Türk basın tarihinde önemli etkiler yaratır. \n\n\nABSTRACT\n\nDağarcık is the periodical published by Ahmet Midhat between 1872 and 1873. Ahmet Midhat, who is a novelist, a journalist and an educator, aims to educate the society by publishing various royalty and translation themed works which were particularly written in that periodical in the Tanzimat Period according to the eclectic and encyclopedic ritual. He also aims to inform the readers of Dağarcık by not making them be bored and not causing them fatigue; meanwhile, by making them spend nice time. These articles published in his early writing career seem to be the source for his works in coming days. The thoughts here mentioned and stated will be continued either by being developed or changed in his next novels, articles and other types of his following works. \nMany of the articles in periodical Dağarcık were written or translated by Ahmet Midhat. Apart from them, there were royalty and translation works of various authors and primarily Recaizade Mahmud Ekrem in the periodical. Although this periodical informs us about intellectual points today, it is especially related to the innovative ideas during its publication. The periodical, thus, was found very strange by certain communities and was exposed to various blames. Since the periodical was published without any permission of the Commission of Education, its publication was stopped. Despite its short publication period, it had an important effect on the history of Turkish Media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it