MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989091038

Anais do 24ª Simpósio Brasileiro de GeoInformática (GEOINFO)

2023· book· ca· W6989091038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2023
Typebook
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Geospatial analysisEvent (particle physics)Space (punctuation)Big data
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume of Proceedings comprises the papers presented at the XXIV Brazilian Symposium on Geoinformatics, GEOINFO 2023, held from December 4 to 6, 2023, at the National Institute for Space Research (INPE) in Sao Jos´e dos Campos, Brazil. The GEOINFO conference series, inaugurated in 1999, continues its mission of convening researchers and students to explore innovative applications in geographic information science and related areas. The Federal University of ABC (UFABC) and INPE were responsible for organizing this edition. The Program Committee accepted 65 papers. The program included 26 oral presentations divided into 6 technical sessions and 39 posters across 3 sessions. The event welcomed over 100 participants from more than 30 national and international institutions. GEOINFO has a rich tradition of attracting world-renowned researchers to engage productively with our community, fostering intriguing exchanges and discussions at the forefront of the field. This year, we were honored to have special keynote presentations by Dr. Antonio Paez from the School of Earth, Environment & Society at McMaster University, Canada, and Dr. Claudia Bauzer Medeiros from the University of Campinas (UNICAMP). Dr. Paez presentation delved into the trajectory of time-geography and its perspectives in the era of Big Data and Mobility Analytics. Meanwhile, Dr. Claudia Bauzer Medeiros discussed the new frontiers shaped by geospatial data collection as well as the challenges of collecting and preserving data for open science practices. Additionally, this edition featured a mini-course on Digital Image Processing for rapid disaster response, conducted by Dr. Laercio Namikawa from INPE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207