Al Qissah al qasirah qissah Fathiyyah al Misriyyah li Nawal al Sa'dawiy (dirasah tahliliyyah ijtimaiyyah markisiyyah)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skripsi ini memilih objek material berupa cerpen yang berjudul “Qishshah \nFathiyah al-Mishriyah” dalam antologi cerpen Adab am Qillatu Adab karya Nawal \nSa’dawi dengan pendekatan sosiologi marxisme. \nMarxisme adalah sebuah pemikiran yang dicetuskan oleh Karl Marx. Pada \ncerpen ini menggambarkan tentang sebuah perjuangan kelas yang berusaha untuk \nmenghapus ketidakadilan di atas kekuasaan. \nMelalui pendekatan sosiologi sastra marxisme cerpen ini dapat disimpulkan \nbahwa konflik sosial politik yang terjadi disebabkan oleh faktor atau kondisi sosial itu \nsendiri. Harta menjadi kiblat dalam menentukan kelas sosial manakah dirinya. \nKebahagiaan pun juga ditentukan kelas sosial. Pada cerpen ini, kelas bawah selalu \ntertindas oleh kelas atas yang berbuat semena-mena bahkan menyiksanya. Seperti \nyang dialami tokoh utama Fathiya, ia dipaksa menikah dengan lelaki tua yang tidak ia \ncintai yang usianya jauh lebih tua darinya. Bahkan setelah menikah ia mendapatkan \nperlakuan kasar dari suaminya. \nKata kunci : Sosiologi Marxisme, Kelas Sosial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.083 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".