Altérités : revue d'anthropologie du contemporain ; vol. 7, no 1, avril 2010, Femmes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Femmes. Féminismes. Anthropologies. Présentation du numéro / Kim Turcot DiFruscia (Université de Montréal) ; Une révolution politique et ses rebondissements (Essai) ; Marie-Blanche Tahon (Université d’Ottawa) ; The limits of “radical democracy”: a gender analysis of “anarchist” activist \ncollectives in Montréal / Erica Lagalisse (McGill University) ; Écoféminisme et développement : l’impasse de l’essentialisation du lien femme/nature / Karine Gagné (Université de Montréal) ; Comment voguer sans chavirer dans les méandres des féminismes : exemple d’un \ntravail ethnographique sur la traite sexuelle (Essai) / Chantal Robillard (Institut de recherche sur la santé des populations Université d’Ottawa) ; \nLes multiples visages de la Malinche ou la manipulation historique d’un personnage féminin / Mariane Gaudreau (Université de Montréal) ; Shapes of freedom. An Interview with Elizabeth A. Povinelli / Kim Turcot DiFruscia (Université de Montréal) ; La parole féminine. Un entretien avec Ida Dominijanni / Filippo Furri (Université de Montréal) ; Les deux de l’amour. Un entretien avec Giulia Sissa / Kim Turcot DiFruscia (Université de Montréal) ; Le mouvement des femmes face à la question des élections dans les vingt dernières années en Iran. Dialogue avec Noushin Ahmadi Khorasani et Parastou Dokouhaki / Shiva Rouholamini (Université de Montréal), Noushin Ahmadi Khorasani ; Listening to voices. An interview with Veena Das / Kim Turcot DiFruscia (Université de Montréal) ; Compte rendu. Au croisement de nos destins. Quand Uepishtikueiau devint Québec, Chrétien, Yves, Denis Delâge et Sylvie Vincent, Recherches amérindiennes au Québec, Montréal, 2009 / Martin Mourre (Université de Montréal/ EHESS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".