MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989274276

Arctic Lake Response to Warming: A Paleolimnological Investigation in the Northwest Territories, Canada

2023· article· en· W6989274276 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTundraPaleolimnologyDiatomArcticLake ecosystemEcosystemClimate changeHoloceneBiogenic silicaGlobal warming
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overall objective is to determine how responsive lake primary production at the northern treeline is to warming today in comparison to the Holocene Thermal Maximum (HTM) to increase our knowledge of Arctic lake ecosystem sensitivity to climate change. Paleolimnological techniques, including chlorophyll a and biogenic silica to infer overall lake and diatom production, respectively, were measured in 10,000-year sediment records from two tundra lakes, Queen’s and McMaster Lakes, located near Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Diatoms were enumerated to identify lake ecosystem response to warming. Lake primary production increased at both lakes during the HTM beginning about ~8,400 cal yr BP due to warming temperatures. Recent anthropogenic warming is more rapid than during the HTM and recent increases in lake primary production are unprecedented. Changes in diatom community composition indicate that increased temperatures during both warming periods led to decreased ice-cover duration and increased growing season serving as drivers for increased lake production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→