MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989278785

Aplicação do modelo de distribuição potencial de Platypodium elegans Vogel na delimitação das Florestas Estacionais na Mata Atlântica

2017· article· en· W6989278785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationSeasonalityAtlantic forestQuarter (Canadian coin)Distribution (mathematics)Spatial distribution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose was evaluate the efficiency the distribuition model of Platypodium elegans Vogel in the mapping of seasonal forests in Atlantic Forest, we elaborate in an area, between the parallels 15o06'' and 20o55'' south and the meridians 35o03'' and 42o57'' Wgr, the model of the distribution this specie for subsequent inference to the Atlantic Forest biome. In this procedure, we used the following environmental layers: altimetry, slope, aspect, annual precipitation, precipitation of driest month, precipitation of wettest quarter and 24 points naturally occurring this specie. The results were evaluated from AUC 0.77± 0.07 and comparing the occurrence map of the specie (model) with the distribution of seasonal forest, in Paranapanema chart. The distribuition model of Platypodium elegans Vogel predicted 56% of the area mapped as seasonal forest, that denotes the acceptable efficiency of model to predict the naturally occurring areas this forest type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207