An AO* based exact algorithm for the Canadian traveler problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian traveler problem (CTP) is a simple, yet challenging, stochastic optimization problem wherein an agent is given a graph where some edges are blocked with certain probabilities and the status of these edges can be disambiguated dynamically upon reaching an incident vertex. The goal is to devise a traversal policy that results in the shortest expected walk length between a given starting vertex and a termination vertex. CTP has been shown to be intractable in many broad settings. In this paper, we introduce an optimal algorithm for the problem based on a Markov decision process formulation, which is a new improvement on AO∗ search that takes advantage of the special problem structure in CTP. We call our algorithm CAO∗, which stands for AO∗ with caching. CAO∗ uses a caching mechanism to avoid re-expansion of previously visited states and makes use of admissible upper bounds at a node level for dynamic state-space pruning. CAO∗ is not polynomial time, but it can dramatically shorten the execution time needed to find an exact solution for moderately sized instances. We present computational experiments on a realistic variant of the problem involving an actual maritime minefield data set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".