MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989318975

Altered cerebrovascular proteome in Alzheimer’s disease mice and the effect of pharmacotherapy

2016· article· en· W6989318975 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteomePharmacotherapyDiseaseDrugAmyloid βCentral nervous systemClinical trialPathological
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerebrovascular insufficiency appears years prior to clinical symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The soluble, highly toxic amyloid-beta (Aβ) species, generated from the amyloidogenic processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP), are known instigators of the chronic cerebrovascular hypoperfusion observed in AD patients. To date, the global response of the cerebrovascular proteome to excess soluble Aβ and to pharmacotherapy that normalizes cerebrovascular function remains poorly understood. We previously demonstrated that the anti-diabetic drug pioglitazone, currently in a Phase III trial for delay of AD onset, reverses cerebrovascular impairment in a mouse model of AD overexpressing Aβ (APP mice). In this study, we characterized the effects of soluble Aβ overproduction on the cerebrovascular proteome of mice; determined how pioglitazone-treatment affected the altered proteome; and analyzed the relationship between normalized protein levels and recovery of cerebrovascular function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→