Appropriate fishing gears for exploiting Nile Perch, Nile Tilapia and Mukene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Catch effort data on which fisheries management regulations are sometimes basedare not available for most lakes in Uganda. However, failure to regulate fishing gearsand methods has been a major cause of collapse of fisheries in the country. Fisherieshave been damaged by destructive and non-selective fishing gears and methods suchas trawling and beach seining, by use of gill nets of mesh size which crop immaturefish and by introduction of mechanised fishing. Selectivity of the gears used to cropLates niloticus L. (Nile perch), Oreochromis niloticus L. (Nile tilapia) and Rastrineobolaargentea (Mukene) which are currently the most important commercial species inUganda were examined in order to recommend the most suitable types, sizes andmethods that should be used in exploiting these fisheries. Gill nets of less than 127mm mainly cropped immature Nile tilapia and Nile perch. To protect these fisheries,the minimum mesh size of gill nets should be set at 127 mm. Seine nets of 5 mm docatch high proportions of immature Mukene while those of 10 mm catch mainly matureMukene. When operated inshore, both sizes catch immature Nile perch and Niletilapia as by-catch. To protect the Mukene fishery and avoid catching immature byecatch,a minimum mesh size of the Mukene net should have been 10 mm operated asLampara type net offshore but since most fishermen have been using the 5 mm seinefor over five years the minimum size should not be allowed to drop below 5 mmpending further thorough investigations. Beach seining, trawling and are destructive tofisheries and should be prohibited until data that may justify their use is available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".