MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989345574

The architecture of Ontario Place: reinvigorating the commons through adaptive-reuse and operative landscapes

2021· dissertation· en· W6989345574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Planning and Landscape Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionArchitectureCommonsArchipelagoLandscape architectureShoreWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ontario Place, located in Lake Ontario along Toronto’s shoreline, was always \nmeant to be for the public. \n In its current conditions, the ongoing neglect by the \nGovernment of Ontario for the last several years, has led to the degradation and \ndisrepair of many of the structures and landscape of the site. How can Ontario \nPlace be reimagined as a commons for the city of Toronto and the province \nof Ontario to experience and celebrate the waterfront? The islands of Ontario \nPlace are reimagined through the lens of nested scales of intervention ranging \nfrom the Great Lakes watershed, to the city of Toronto, the waterfront, and \nthe five Pod buildings on the site. Historic-interpretive research was completed \non the designers of Ontario Place, megastructure precedents, and site studies \nof the current conditions. The knowledge gained from the research and site \nanalysis of Ontario Place influenced a series of architectural and environmental \ninterventions to the site. \nThe design interventions take into consideration both the landscape and \narchitectural re-mediation and re-imagination of a new commons using \nsustainability, ecology, rewilding, and interactive play/ learning as key \ncomponents of the design for a new operative landscape. A living breakwater off \nthe shores of the islands, a data collection archipelago around the Great Lakes, \nwetland planting, water filtration and ruin demolition for replanting remediate \nthe landscape of Ontario Place. An adaptive-reuse of the out-of-commission Pod \nmegastructures, strips the current skin of the buildings to expose the structural \nframe underneath. This frame is loaded with plug n’ play containers that hold \nvarious public programs. These containers are plugged in and out seasonally, \nrefreshing and molding to the needs of the community. Greater impacts of the \nproject aim to generate more public green space along the Toronto waterfront \nfor the community in the midst of COVID-19, create a pilot project for the health \nof the Great Lakes system and education of the public, as well as continuing \nthe recent reclamation of the waterfront from industry to public space by \nWaterfront Toronto for all people to enjoy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.034
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicUrban Planning and Landscape DesignFrench-language works237,207