Archaeopalynological evidence from the Holy Sepulcher area: preliminary results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. The Basilica of the Holy Sepulcher, in the Christian quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem (Israel), represents an extraordinary site in terms of historical and cultural importance. An archaeological excavation connected with the restoration of the floor of the Basilica is being carried out by Sapienza University of Rome in accordance with the Communities who have custody of the Holy Sepulcher and licensed by the Israel Antiquities Authority. The archaeological study involves the comprehensive collection of all plant materials recovered during the excavation, including pollen. It is a rare opportunity to provide a paleoenvironmental reconstruction, the first palynological evidence from the Basilica of the Holy Sepulcher. In fact, of the archeopalynological research conducted in the Israeli region, only two studies have been conducted in the city of Jerusalem (Langgut et al., 2013; Kisilevitz et al., 2017). The purpose of this study is to enrich the information given by the study of macroremains in order to understand and reconstruct the past environment and the human impact from the pre-Basilica time to the Crusader. \nMethods. Soil samples were directly collected adopting blanket sampling and sterile vials. A known quantity of Lycopodium spores was added to each weighted sample to estimate the concentration of pollen and non-pollen palynomorphs (NPPs). To obtain clearer slides, sample residues were sieved using a 10 μm nylon sieve and immersed in an ultrasonic bath. A transmitted light optical microscope with variable magnifications (400x and 630x) was used for the identification of pollen grains. \nResults. This preliminary palynological analysis unexpectedly shows a good concentration for archaeological contexts, despite the poor preservation state. Anyway, an interesting insight of the Jerusalem vegetation is recorded with high values of non-arboreal pollen. Tens of different taxa have been identified, among them, in order of abundance, are Cichorieae followed by Asteroideae and Amaranthaceae. The arboreal flora list is quite rich, although in lower percentages: Quercus ilex type, Olea, Quercus cerris type, and traces of Fraxinus and Pinus were found. \nConclusions. The samples chronologically belonging to the quarry previous the Roman phase and the Basilica construction. The high amount of Cichorieae in all samples is the result of selective corrosion and overestimated the herbs. Nonetheless, the herbs assemblage describes an open environment with human disturbance as attested by Urtica and Plantago growing in pasturelands and disturbed areas. The trees list enriches the picture given by the charcoals giving an insight of the surrounding area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".