MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989426462

Autonomía y gobernanza universitaria: aproximaciones y desencuentros

2024· article· es· W6989426462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governanceAutonomyQuarter (Canadian coin)Democratic governanceLatin Americans
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La forma de gestionar el sistema universitario ha estado en análisis académico en el último cuarto de siglo con una fuerza inusitada. La gobernanza universitaria es una categoría científica en construcción en la actualidad, debido al esfuerzo de múltiples investigadores en todo el continente. El artículo tiene como objetivo sistematizar los principales elementos que caracterizan a la autonomía y la gobernanza universitaria en América Latina, así como su interrelación, luego de una década de significativos aportes teóricos y prácticos. La metodología empleada se basa en el análisis de literatura académica publicada en revistas de alto impacto científico, determinando los principales elementos que contribuyan a la integración del conocimiento en torno al objeto de estudio. Las conclusiones apuntan hacia la necesidad de continuar aportando a la gobernanza universitaria, desarrollar investigaciones interdisciplinarias y fomentar la generalización de los resultados. Palabras clave: Gobernanza universitaria, políticas públicas, educación superior, autonomía. ABSTRACT The way of managing the university system has been in academic analysis in the last quarter of a century with an unusual force. University governance is a scientific category currently under construction due to the efforts of multiple researchers across the continent. The article aims to systematize the main elements that characterize autonomy and university governance in Latin America after a decade of significant theoretical and practical contributions. The methodology used is based on the analysis of academic literature published in journals of high scientific impact, determining the main elements contributing to the integration of knowledge around the object of study. The conclusions point to the need to continue contributing to university governance, develop interdisciplinary research, and promote the generalization of the results. Keywords: University governance, public policies, higher education, autonomy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0130.010
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.329
GPT teacher head0.597
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207