Autonomía y gobernanza universitaria: aproximaciones y desencuentros
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La forma de gestionar el sistema universitario ha estado en análisis académico en el último cuarto de siglo con una fuerza inusitada. La gobernanza universitaria es una categoría científica en construcción en la actualidad, debido al esfuerzo de múltiples investigadores en todo el continente. El artículo tiene como objetivo sistematizar los principales elementos que caracterizan a la autonomía y la gobernanza universitaria en América Latina, así como su interrelación, luego de una década de significativos aportes teóricos y prácticos. La metodología empleada se basa en el análisis de literatura académica publicada en revistas de alto impacto científico, determinando los principales elementos que contribuyan a la integración del conocimiento en torno al objeto de estudio. Las conclusiones apuntan hacia la necesidad de continuar aportando a la gobernanza universitaria, desarrollar investigaciones interdisciplinarias y fomentar la generalización de los resultados. Palabras clave: Gobernanza universitaria, políticas públicas, educación superior, autonomía. ABSTRACT The way of managing the university system has been in academic analysis in the last quarter of a century with an unusual force. University governance is a scientific category currently under construction due to the efforts of multiple researchers across the continent. The article aims to systematize the main elements that characterize autonomy and university governance in Latin America after a decade of significant theoretical and practical contributions. The methodology used is based on the analysis of academic literature published in journals of high scientific impact, determining the main elements contributing to the integration of knowledge around the object of study. The conclusions point to the need to continue contributing to university governance, develop interdisciplinary research, and promote the generalization of the results. Keywords: University governance, public policies, higher education, autonomy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".