Aristoteles'in Dört Neden Kuramının Çeviribilim Alanındaki Kuramsal Yaklaşımlara Etkisi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Effect of Aristotle's Four-Cause Theory on the Theoretical Approaches in the Field of Translation StudiesBeing one of the most significant philosophers of the philosophy and thereby the history of thought; and having written works on many fields such as primarily logic, physic, metaphysic, astronomy, politics, rhetoric Aristotle's (384-322 B.C.) thoughts pointed out in these works have a great importance in lots of disciplines constructing their own theories.The four-cause theory he uses in explanation of an entity getting into existence, is a guiding light to reaching the exact knowledge of the entity.Up to the present, when reaching the knowledge of the existence and explanation of the facts come into question, various branches of science have benefited from the four-cause theory.In the last decades, it has been questioned whether translation studies, which has attempted to become a branch of science in the last quarter of the 1 Bu makale 2016 ylnda danmanln Prof. Dr. Muharrem Tosun'un yapt "eviribilimde Skopos
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it