MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989441217

Ärisüsteemide partitsioneerimine Docker platvormil

2017· dissertation· et· W6989441217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace repository (University of Tartu) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageet
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisKey (lock)Information systemProcess (computing)Interpretation (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ärisüsteemid on keerulised arvutisüsteemid, mis loovad väärtust nende omanikele. Reegilina süsteemide väärtused koos oma olemustega erinevad üksteisest, kuid süsteemid ise on ehitatud geneerilisematest komponentidest, mis on kokku seotud tegelikku väärtust lisava äriloogikaga. Antud süsteemid võivad olla paigutatud suurtesse riistvaraklastritesse. Sellest tulenevalt võib selliste süsteemide loomine ja haldamine nõuda märgatavalt vaeva.\\n\\rKäesolev lõputöö uurib Dockerit, mis on tarkvara konteinerite platvorm. Seda kasutedes on püütud standardiseerida ning automatiseerida tehisliku ärisüsteemi juurtamist. Ühtlasi fokuseerib antud uurimistöö ärisusteemide partitsioneerimise automatiseerimisele mitmele riistvara sõlmele. Selle saavutamiseks testitakse METIS graafi partitsioneerimise teekide ja tööriistadega.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace repository (University of Tartu)Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207