Assessing the value of stable water isotopes in hydrologic modeling: a dual-isotope approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis presents the development of a dual-isotope simulation in a hydrological model, and its application to the lower Nelson River basin. The purpose of this study is to find if the simulation of stable water isotopes aids in hydrological simulation, and if a dual-isotope simulation is an improvement over a single-isotope simulation. The isoWATFLOOD model was enhanced to include δ2H and improve physical representativeness. The model was calibrated using various isotope and flow simulation error functions. Internal hydrologic storages and fluxes were verified by comparing simulated isotope values to observed isotope data. Adding isotope error to the calibration resulted in small but consistent improvements to the physical basis of calibrated parameter values. Isotope simulation error was found to be the best predictor of streamflow simulation performance beyond the calibration period. The dual-isotope simulation identified a number of model limitations and potential improvements from the verification of internal hydrologic storages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".