MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989636174

Blue carbon storage in the Cowichan Estuary, British Columbia

2021· dissertation· en· W6989636174 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlue carbonCarbon sequestrationSalt marshEcosystemSeagrassHabitatCarbon cycleEstuaryEcosystem servicesAtmospheric carbon cycleCarbon fibers
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capacity of the world’s coastal ecosystems to sequester carbon dioxide (CO2), termed “Blue Carbon,” has been a major focus of research in recent decades due to its potential to mitigate climate change. Vegetated coastal ecosystems such as mangroves, seagrass beds, and salt marshes represent a global area that is one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that of terrestrial forests, yet their contribution to long-term carbon sequestration is much greater per unit-area, in part because of their high productivity and efficiency in trapping suspended matter and associated organic carbon. Despite the value that Blue Carbon (BC) systems offer in sequestering carbon, as well as providing numerous other goods and services, these habitats are being lost at critical rates and require urgent action in order to prevent further degradation and loss. Recognition of the carbon sequestration value of vegetated coastal ecosystems provides a strong argument for their protection and restoration, and global efforts are now underway to include BC ecosystems into global carbon offset budgets, focusing on their optimal management to optimize CO2 sequestration and minimize CO2 emissions. Here, BC was investigated in the Cowichan Estuary in relation to habitat type (salt marsh, eelgrass meadow, non-vegetated mudflats, and oyster shell beds), and habitat degradation. Stored organic carbon (OC) and inorganic carbon (IC) were quantified in the top 20 cm depth of sediment cores, as well as in eelgrass and salt marsh vegetation, and then extrapolated to the areal extent of each habitat type based on a high resolution 1:12,000 scale base map of the estuary. Rates of sedimentation and carbon sequestration were quantified in each habitat type using 210Pb radiometric dating, and organic matter (OM) sources and quality were assessed in each habitat type using δ13C, C/N ratios and photopigment content in the sediments. A particular focus on the lower intertidal zone allowed us to examine the potential impact of industrial activity (log transport and storage) on the estuary’s capacity for carbon storage, as a result of a reduction of suitable habitat for eelgrass and microphytobenthos (MPB). Additionally, IC was quantified in aboveground oyster shell beds and buried oyster shell to assess inorganic storage. Finally, potential valuation of Blue Carbon in the Cowichan Estuary was investigated by comparing carbon sequestration to provincial greenhouse gas (GHG) emission equivalents as well as carbon sequestration in B.C. forests. We found that the salt marsh was the most important carbon reservoir, with a mean per-hectare sediment organic carbon (SOC) stock of 49.1 ± 19.9 Mg C ha-1, total ecosystem carbon stock (TECS) of 5443.75 Mg C, and carbon accumulation rate of 74 ± 23 g C m-2 yr-1. In the other habitats, we found SOC stocks and TECS respectively 19.1 ± 3.78 Mg C ha-1 and 3651.6 ± 72.3 Mg C in the upper mudflats, 16.9 ± 4.36 Mg C ha-1 and 1058.85 Mg C in the lower mudflats, 17.9 ± 1.21 Mg C ha−1 and 324.57 Mg C in the eelgrass meadow, and 9.43 ± 1.50 Mg C ha-1 and 59.4 Mg C in the oyster beds. The eelgrass meadow had a carbon accumulation rate of 38 ± 26 g C m-2 yr-1, while the mudflats could not successfully be dated due to erosion and/or mixing. Furthermore, the salt marsh contained the highest proportion of recalcitrant, terrestrial-derived root material which was more protected from hydrodynamic forces compared to other habitats. No pattern differences were observed between the carbon reservoirs or bulk properties of the log boom area (lower mudflat) compared to the upper mudflat, and thus there was no evidence that the log booms significantly decrease carbon sequestration in the areas where they make frequent contact with the seafloor. However, decreased chlorophyll a (chl a) concentrations in the lower mudflat sediment suggests a possible detrimental impact on microphytobenthos in addition to preventing the recolonization of the seagrass Zostera marina (Z. marina). Carbon stocks in the eelgrass meadow were similar to those of the mudflats. These carbon stocks were lower than global averages but consistent with those recently reported in low Z. marina meadows in the Pacific Northwest. Evidence of significant eelgrass vegetation outwelling necessitates further investigation to elucidate the degree to which these primary products are being decomposed or buried elsewhere in the estuary or open ocean. Since approximately half of the historical salt marsh habitat is currently reclaimed for agricultural and industrial use, consideration should be given to the role of the marsh system as a carbon reservoir in future land-use policy in the Cowichan Estuary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsFrench-language works237,207