MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989647347

Bi-Level Energy Dispatch Optimisation for Peak Load Shaving in Microgrids with Battery Storage

2025· article· en· W6989647347 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeaking power plantLoad profilePeak loadBattery (electricity)Scheduling (production processes)Load shiftingGridEnergy storageElectricityPower (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peak load periods in electrical networks result in significant power losses, straining generation capacity, and increasing operational costs. Strategically optimising electricity supply from battery storage-based distributed generation (DG) during these peak times can mitigate these losses and enhance grid efficiency through peak load shaving (PLS). However, electrical loads vary throughout the day and night. Thus, identifying peak and off-peak loads would be the most challenging task to complete before scheduling operations for batteries. This study presents a bi-level energy optimisation framework to identify the peak and off-peak loads and plan the energy dispatching operations for battery storage. The bi-level energy optimisation framework is developed in such a way that during the first level, peak load times (PLT), off-peak load times (OPLT), and no operation times (NOT) from the daily time-varying load profiles are identified. During the second level, scheduling of energy supply to and from the batteries is performed using a seven stage battery dispatch controller. Considering the reduction in power losses as a primary objective function, the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to solve the optimisation problem for three time-varying load profiles (industrial, residential, and commercial) using an IEEE 33 bus microgrids network. The numerical results for three case studies have revealed that the proposed method could significantly shave the peak loads by 23.3% in industrial, 18.89% in residential and 10.99% in commercial loads. Due to the shaving of peak loads, the reductions in power loss of 5.73%, 5.44%, and 2.45% in each load profile are also noticed. To further validate the efficacy, the results from the optimisation framework were compared with results using fixed values. The comparison showed that the proposed optimisation approach could achieve maximum peak shaving in microgrids. The PLS, reduction in daily power losses, improvement in load factors, and enhancements in bus voltage profiles for each load confirm that the proposed optimisation approach can be helpful in the future planning of PLS in microgrids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207