MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989664191

Brachiopods from the Middle Devonian Hamilton Group of Southwestern Ontario, Canada

2009· article· en· W6989664191 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianFaunaGroup (periodic table)TrilobiteStructural basinConodont
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The late Middle Devonian (Givetian) Hamilton Group of southwestern Ontario is well known worldwide for its diverse, abundant and well-preserved brachiopod fauna. Yet, despite their undoubted value as a paleontological resource, the Hamilton Group brachiopods have been largely ignored over the past few decades in terms of their systematics and potential biostratigraphic value. A detailed systematic study of brachiopods collected from exposed strata of the Hamilton Group in the Arkona-Thedford-Ipperwash area of southwestern Ontario has led to the recognition of 50 species assigned to 34 genera, among which one species, Devonochonetes arkonensis n. sp., has been newly defined. A quantitative study of 38 brachiopod associations from the Hamilton Group of southwestern Ontario and equivalent strata in the Appalachian and the Michigan basins, using Q-mode (taxa as variables) and R-mode (localities/ages as variables) cluster analyses, principal component analysis, and four faunal similarity analyses (i.e., Jaccard similarity, Dice similarity, Simpson’s coefficient of similarity, and Raup-Crick similarity indices), has revealed that the late Middle Devonian (Givetian) brachiopod faunas from time-equivalent strata of the Michigan and Appalachian are distinct, allowing identification of two separate faunal subprovinces. In spite of its present-day position in the southeastern part of the Michigan Basin, southwestern Ontario had brachiopod associations which were more similar to those in contemporaneous strata of the Appalachian Basin during the deposition of the lower and middle Hamilton sediments. This may have been related to the absence of a topographic high in the present-day Findlay Arch area that would have otherwise prevented immigration of Appalachian Basin fauna into the study area. During the deposition of the upper Hamilton strata, the southwestern Ontario brachiopod associations developed a closer affinity to those of the Michigan Basin, suggesting that I M'» ii* J jw - ’ » a in O ; Jfiiu t1 prii the immigration of brachiopod faunas from the Appalachian Basin into the study area was impeded. This change in faunal affinity may have been related to the formation of a local arch at present-day Cleveland area of Ohio that blocked the immigration of Appalachian Basin taxa into the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→